TBI Research Review: Post-TBI Depression

Mount Sinai Medical Center
TBI Research Review: Post-TBI Depression

Post-TBI Depression, Issue 1, April 2004

The aim of TBI Research Review is to summarize current research on traumatic brain injury (TBI), offer suggestions for future research planning and suggest application of research findings to clinical practice and policy. The focus in this first issue is on post-TBI depression.

What Do We Know about the Incidence, Prevalence, and Patterns of Depression after TBI?

  • Depression is the most common Axis I disorder following TBI 1-7.
  • Prevalence rates vary widely in the literature. This variation is a product both of differing cohorts studied (inpatients, outpatients, community-based samples; groups varying in severity of injury and in time since injury), and of different diagnostic methods adopted (diagnostic interviews such as the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV, family interview, clinical impressions, self report).
  • Depression is significantly more prevalent in individuals with TBI than in individuals without a disability 1 and in individuals with other disabilities 7-11.
  • Depression post TBI is often co-morbid with other Axis I disorders 1,3-5,12-13, with anxiety disorders the most common co-morbidity.
  • The course of depression follows many patterns. It may be chronic, as evidenced by elevated rates of post TBI depression documented many years after injury 1,9, or it may resolve. Depression may emerge immediately or only several years after injury 13; a small subgroup of individuals do not become depressed post TBI 5,13.
  • Depression appears to be unrelated to demographic factors (e.g., gender, age, ethnic background, level of education) or to characteristics of injury (e.g., severity of TBI, time since injury).
  • Pre-TBI history of depression is a risk factor for development of post-TBI depression 5,13.

What Do We Know about the Psychosocial Correlates of Post-TBI Depression?

Considerable research has shown that post-TBI depression is associated with a variety of negative correlates — both for individuals with TBI and their caretakers. Compared to those who are not depressed, individuals with post-TBI depression experience:

  • Poorer rehabilitation outcomes 14-15
  • Greater functional disability 3,16-17
  • Reduced activities of daily living 12
  • Less social and recreational activity 18
  • Less employment potential 19
  • Elevated divorce rates 15
  • Greater caregiver burden 20-22
  • Greater sexual dysfunction 23
  • Lower ratings of health 24
  • Poorer subjective well-being 18,25
  • Poorer quality of life 18,26-28
  • Increased rates of suicidal ideation 29

It is not clear from these studies whether a causal relationship exists between depression and any of these other life elements and, if so, the directionality of the causality. It is clear, however, that depression implies a variety of other negative life circumstances.

What Do We Know about the Treatment of Post-TBI Depression?

Research on approaches to treating depression in individuals with TBI remains limited:

  • Published studies of psychopharmacological treatments of depression are few, lack double-blind clinical trials and often produce mixed or unexpected results 7,30.
  • Although psychotherapy remains the preferred means of treatment of mood disorders in individuals with TBI 1-2,31-33, studies evaluating specific approaches to psychotherapy in the treatment of post-TBI depression are inadequate, consisting primarily of uncontrolled case reports, case series, and single-case design studies 7.
  • In treating depressive symptoms after TBI, the choice of psychotherapeutic method is important, as cognitive deficits often limit the individual’s ability to profit from psychodynamic approaches 34. Individuals with TBI may benefit from treatments that specifically take into account cognitive distortions.
  • Caution should be taken when utilizing psychopharmacologic treatments, as individuals with TBI are more likely to experience side effects from these medications 2.

Implications for Future Research and for Dissemination

From available studies a relatively clear picture of post-TBI depression emerges: it is a highly prevalent and destructive disorder. However, too few studies lay an adequate groundwork for treatment and for understanding the dynamics of post-TBI depression. Future research should be shaped to rectify methodological weaknesses in available research as well as to address pressing questions, particularly focused on factors that provide insight on prevention and treatment:

Longitudinal studies of individuals with TBI are needed to:

  • Track the patterns of emergence, resolution and chronicity of depression during the initial decade post injury,
  • Identify triggers for depression,
  • Identify coping strategies that inoculate the individual against depression, and
  • Identify contextual and environmental elements that either prevent depression or facilitate its resolution.
  • Standard assessment tools (e.g., Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV, or SCID) must be utilized in diagnosing TBI and other Axis I disorders, to permit cross-study comparisons.
  • Qualitative studies are needed to gain insights from people with TBI about factors — both personal and environmental — that they experience as being harmful or helpful with respect to their mood.
  • Studies are needed:
  • To determine if effective treatment of depression alters long-term psychosocial outcome for individuals with TBI, and
  • To evaluate the impact of family interventions on the long-term adjustment of individuals with TBI.
  • Future research focused on treatments should include:
  • Randomized trials of antidepressant medications,
  • Randomized trials of a variety of types of psychotherapy,
  • Randomized trials of antidepressant medications and psychotherapy, in combination,
  • Investigation of factors mediating treatment efficacy, and
  • Evaluation of pre-TBI Axis I disorders as moderators of post-TBI treatment outcome.

Further, within health care professions, inadequate awareness exists of the extent and characteristics of depression that follows injury. Educational materials need to be developed and disseminated to current professionals and to educators responsible for curriculum development, to affect input into professionals-in-training.

Implications for Clinical Practice

Changes are needed in standards of practice with respect to post-TBI depression. Efforts need to be made to develop standards of practice addressing the following points:

  • Physicians and other health care providers need to be better informed of the prevalence of depression that emerges post TBI and methods to assess this comorbid condition.
  • Clinicians need to assess — systematically, proactively and routinely — an individual's mood post TBI, to enhance identification and promote referral for services, and/or the timely use of psychotropic medications.
  • Clinicians should monitor patients for suicidal ideation.
  • Clinicians need to broaden assessment to systematically and regularly assess other Axis I disorders (co-morbid with depression) that can serve to maintain an individual's depression post TBI.
  • Clinicians need to inquire about pre-TBI Axis I disorders, as this history places the individual at increased risk of development of post-TBI Axis I disorders.
  • Clinicians should assess marital and family stresses, and intervene within the context of therapy with the patient and/or refer the family for treatment.

Implications for Consumers

  • Consumers and members of their support network need to become proactive in their interactions with health service providers with respect to their being monitored for depression post injury. Specifically, they should be asking their primary health care provider to be monitoring them regularly for symptoms of post-TBI depression. If depression emerges, they should be asking for referral for psychotherapy or for antidepressive medications.
  • Consumers need to become advocates for expanded research focused on treatment of depression and for public policy that reflects the long-term (typically lifelong) consequences of TBI.
  • Implications for Public Policy
  • TBI should be viewed as a life-long disability requiring ongoing treatment rather than viewed as an acute illness with resolution over time. Insurance and service providers need to plan for lifelong support of individuals post TBI.
  • An increase in funding for needed psychological/psychiatric clinical trials is warranted in the area of TBI and Axis I pathology.
  • The research agendas of Federal funding agencies such as CDC, NIDRR, NIH, and SAMHSA should be directed to the issue of post-TBI depression, especially in terms that are summarized herein.

References

1. Hibbard, M.R., Uysal, S., Kepler, K., Bogdany, J., and Silver, J. (1998). Axis I psychopathology in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 13, 24-39.

2. National Institutes of Health. (1998). Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. NIH Consensus Statement, Vol. 16, No. 1, October 26-28, pp. 1-41.

3. Fann, J.R., Katon, W.J., Uomoto, J.M., and Esselman, P.C. (l995). Psychiatric disorders and functional disability in outpatients with traumatic brain injuries. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152 (10), 1493-1499

4. Van Reekum, R., Bolago, I., Finlayson, M.S., Garner, A., and Links, P.S. (1996). Psychiatric disorders after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 10, 319-327.

5. Ashman, T.A., Spielman, L.A., Hibbard, M.R., Silver, J.M., Chandna, T., and Gordon, W.A. (2004). Psychiatric challenges in the first 6 years after traumatic brain injury: cross-sequential analyses of Axis I disorders. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, (4, Suppl. 2), S36-S42.

6. Deb, S., Lyons, I., Koutzouskis, C., Ali, I., and McCarthy, G. (l999). Rate of psychiatric illness 1 year after traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 374-378

7. Rosenthal, M., Christensen, B.K., and Ross, T.P. (1998). Depression following traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 90-103.

8. Glenn, M.B., O'Neil-Pirozzi, T., Goldstein, R., Burke, D., and Jacob, L. (2001). Depression amongst outpatients with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 15, 811-818.

9. Holsinger, T., Steffens, D.C., Phillips, C. et al. (2002). Head injury in early adulthood and the lifetime risk of depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 17-22.

10. Koponen, S., Taiminen, T., Portin, R., Himanen, L., Isoniemi, H., Heinonen, H. et al. (2002). Axis I and II psychiatric disorders after traumatic brain injury: a 30-year follow-up study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1315-1321.

11. Kreutzer, J.S., Seel, R.T., and Gourley, E. (2001). The prevalence and symptom rates of depression after traumatic brain injury: a comprehensive examination. Brain Injury, 15, 563-576.

12. Jorge, R.E., Robinson, R.G., Starkstein, S.E., and Arndt, S.V. (l994). Influence of major depression on 1 year outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurosurgery 81, 726-733

13. Hibbard, M.R., Ashman, T.A., Spielman, L.A., Chun, D., Charatz, H., and Melvin, S. (2004). Relationship between depression and psychosocial functioning and health following traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, (4, Suppl. 2), S43-S53.

14. Brooks, N., Campsie, L., Symington, C., Beattie, A., and McKinlay, W. (1987). The effect of head injury on patients and relatives within seven years of injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 2, 1-13.

15. Thomsen, I.V. (1984). Late outcome of very severe blunt head trauma: a 10-15 year second follow-up. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 47, 260-268.

16. Christensen, B.K., Ross, T.P., Kotasek, R.S., Rosenthal, M., and Henry, R.R. (1994). The role of depression in rehabilitation outcome in the acute recovery of patients with TBI. Advances in Medical Psychotherapy,7, 23-38.

17. Rapoport, M.J., McCullagh, S., Streiner, D., and Feinstein, A. (2003). The clinical significance of major depression following mild traumatic brain injury. Psychosomatics, 44(1), 31-36.

18. Brown, M., Gordon, W.A., and Spielman, L. (2003). Participation in social and recreational activity in the community by individuals with traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 48, 266-274.

19. Bruckner, F. E., and Randle, A. P. (1972). Return to work after severe head injuries. Rheumatology and Physical Medicine, 11, 344-348.

20. Bond, M.R. (1975). Assessment of the psychosocial outcome after severe head injury. In Ciba Foundation Symposium: Outcome of severe damage to the central nervous system. No. 34. Amsterdam: Elsevier-Excerpta Medica.

21. Bond, M.R. (l984). The psychiatry of closed head injury. In Brooks, N. (ed.), Closed head injury: psychological, social and family consequences. New York: Oxford Press.

22. Oddy, M., Humphrey, M., and Uttley, D. (1978). Stress upon the relatives of head injured patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 133, 507-513.

23. Hibbard, M.R., Gordon, W.A., Flanagan, S., Haddad, L., and Labinsky, E. (2000). Sexual dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 15, 107-120.

24. Breed, S.T., Flanagan, S.R., and Watson, K.R. (2004). The relationship between age and self-report of health symptoms in individuals with TBI. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, (4, Suppl. 2), S61-S67.

25. Granger, C.V. (1985). Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: an analysis based upon the impairment, disability, and handicap model. International Rehabilitation Medicine, 7(2), 45-50.

26. Bullinger, M., Azouvi, P., Brooks, N., Basso, A., Christensen, A.L., Gobiet, W. et al. (2002). Quality of life in patients with traumatic brain injury-basic issues, assessment and recommendations. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 20(3-4), 111-124.

27. Findler, M., Cantor, J., Haddad, L., Gordon, W., and Ashman, T. (2001). The reliability and validity of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire for use with individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 15, 715-723.

28. Steadman-Pare, D., Colantonio, A., Ratcliff, G., Chase, S., and Vernich, L. (2001). Factors associated with perceived quality of life many years after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16, 330-342.

29. Silver, J.M., Kramer, R., Greenwood, S., Weissman, M. (2001). The association between head injuries and psychiatric disorders: findings from the New Haven NIMH epidemiological catchment area study. Brain Injury, 15 (11), 935-45.

30. Cassidy, J.W. (1989). Fluoxetine: a new serotonergically active antidepressant. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 4, 67-69.

31. Payne, H.C. (2000). Traumatic brain injury, depression and cannabis use — assessing their effects on cognitive performance. Brain Injury, 15, 479-489.

32. Medd, J., and Tate, R.L. (2000). Evaluation of an anger management therapy programme following acquired brain injury: a preliminary study. Neuropschological Rehabilitation, 10(2), 185-201.

33. Sohlberg, M.M. (2000). Psychotherapy approaches. In S.A. Raskin. and C.A. Mateer (eds.), Neuropsychological management of mild traumatic brain injury (pp. 137-156). New York: Oxford University Press.

34. Hibbard, M.R., Grober, S.E., Gordon, W.A., Aletta, E.F., and Freeman, A. (1990). Cognitive therapy and the treatment of post stroke depression. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. 5(3), 43-55.

Posted on BrainLine July 25, 2008

From Mount Sinai Medical Center. www.mssm.edu.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.