Baseline neurocognitive assessment in sports is becoming more popular — and more useful for helping players better recover from one or more concussions.
Baseline neurocognitive assessment in sports is becoming more popular — and more useful for helping players better recover from one or more concussions.
Produced by Victoria Tilney McDonough and Brian King, BrainLine.
Jeffrey Barth, PhD, ABPP-CN holds the position of professor and co-director of the Neurocognitive Assessment Laboratory, and section head, Neurocognitive Studies in the Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, with a joint appointment in the Department of Neurological Surgery at the University of Virginia School of Medicine.
The contents of Brainline (the “Web Site”), such as text, graphics, images, information obtained from the Web Site’s licensors and/or consultants, and other material contained on the Web Site (collectively, the “Content”) are for informational purposes only. The Content is not intended to be a substitute for medical, legal, or other professional advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
Specifically, with regards to medical issues, always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on the Web Site. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or 911 immediately. The Web Site does not recommend or endorse any specific tests, physicians, products, procedures, opinions, or other information that may be mentioned on the Web Site. Reliance on any information provided by the Web Site or by employees, volunteers or contractors or others associated with the Web Site and/or other visitors to the Web Site is solely at your own risk.
Your review of the role Neurocognitive testing can play in assessing payers pre and post concussion relative to return to play decisions and outlining the dangers of concussions was well put. However, I was disappointed by the focus on Neurocognitive testing as if it was the âanswerâ to the problem. Hence this email to draw your attention to the NCAA position statement on concussion management which can be reviewed at: http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/327bf600424d263692cdd6132e10b8df/Memo+Concussion+Managment+04292010.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=327bf600424d263692cdd6132e10b8df The critical emphasis being that a 3 pronged approach based on symptoms, cognition and balance control is required to understand the impact of a concussion and the resolution of the same. In short, no one test stands alone in the process. Thank you for your time. JON F. PETERS, Ph.D. | Vice President & General Manager NeuroCom® International, Inc. 9570 SE Lawnfield Road, Clackamas, OR 97015 ( + 1 503 353 4011| * JPeters@natus.com Ã+1 503 702 3896 | à +1 503 653 1991
I am a unique recovering multiple Severe TBI Victim. I have a mature brain and therefore maybe the reason I am fortunate to recover from this most recent injury which happen in 2009. Struck my a car resulted in brain bleed plus 2 severe TBIs. MY COMA LASTED TWO WEEKS AND HA PRE AMNESIA UPTO 2-4WKS PRIOR, and total amnesia of the event with partial memory of the day and prior day. During recovery I took my 6 yr anniversity PA certification Bords anf rec'd a passing score thus retaining my title of PA-C, I was able to return part time to my occupation with the Department of Defense as a TBI Screener and Provider, here at Fort Carson (the seed of military TBI Program) as a credential provider/ impaired provider. Although, I have display of remarkable recovery I feel my medical providers, my family and federal work comp section have different plans and are encouraging be to move on and out thus using my disability as an obstacle to my potential therapeutic recovery. I personnally feel their is an avenue here for a success story for TBI VICTIMS instead of retiring me to the woodwork. The current medical and society population is unaware of the financial, emotional and self esteem toll placed on the victim and the family. The young soldiers are experiencing the deleima of a young brain and drawn in to the world of uncertainty. If they say Yes Imay have rec'd a concussion, the command and their leaders lable them as a trouble maker, but l;ack of knowledge and following orders reluctingly remove them from combat. The soldier is than burden with guilt and in some cases survoir guilt. The end product is denying the incident and upon redeployment home experiencing the symptoms and frustration taken out on the family or dealt eneffectively by the leadership. Matters turn worse when the soldier attempts to seek help by going AWOL, alcohol use or Drugs. Confiding in friends is no help because the soldier has changed or changing and friends distancing themselves. Matters worsen when the soldier discharge attempts care thru VA and beuraccracy confuses the soldier even more.
Jan 7th, 2011 7:40pm